[3]
Further the resemblance between the two is so close that it is not easy
to distinguish between them. For although certain
kinds differ, while retaining a general resemblance
(since both involve a departure from the simple and
straightforward method of expression coupled with
a certain rhetorical excellence), on the other hand
some are distinguished by the narrowest possible
dividing line: for example, while irony belongs to
figures of thought just as much as to tropes,1 periphrasis,
hyperbaton and onomatopoea2 have been ranked by
distinguished authors as figures of speech rather than
tropes.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.